United States v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
620 F.2d 709 · 1980
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably State v. Toste (1986), United States v. Muniz (1993)
33 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Santoni v. United States · United States v. Mauro · Ryan v. United States · Drew v. United States · First National Bank v. Dickinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[AJppellant was not serving a “term of imprisonment” within the meaning of the statute. Appellant was in custody awaiting trial on state and federal charges and awaiting revocation of his parole arising out of an earlier state charge. The purpose of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act is to minimize the adverse impact of a foreign prosecution on rehabilitative programs of the confining jurisdiction. We agree with the decisions of other circuits that neither a pretrial detainee nor a parole violator has a sufficient interest in the rehabilitation programs of his confining institution to justify invocation of the Act.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If trial is not had on any indictment ... prior to the prisoner's being returned to the original place of imprisonment ... such indictment ... shall not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it was made by a state officer, without the direction of a federal agent or officer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Ray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.