Kittel v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
620 F.3d 949 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Flast v. Cohen · Spencer v. Kemna · Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration · Burkey v. Marberry · Arrington v. Daniels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would simply reiterate a fact that is not in dispute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provide a belt-and-suspenders opinion on a downstream controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is nothing remaining for this court to decide.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kittel v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.