620 F. Supp. 208 - Stackhouse v. DeSitter’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably United States v. Gilbert (1987), Bloch v. Frischholz (2009)
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · United States v. Menasche · Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. · Nestler v. Exxon Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[fjor any person to coerce, intimidate, threaten or interfere with any person in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his having aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of any right granted or protected by this Ordinance.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) in the exercise or enjoyment of any right protected by see. ‘s 3603-3606; (2) on account of the person’s having exercised or enjoyed such a right; and (3) on account of his having aided or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of such a right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stirgus v. Benoit
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.