Barry v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Gibson v. Berryhill · Bloom v. Illinois · Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“put pressure on selected ALJs to reduce their precentage of benefit allowances, thereby denying claimants of their right to an impartial ALJ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The determination of the Secretary is reversed and remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“impermissibly affected the Appeals Council.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.