Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 FSUPP2D 193 - Brooks v. Halsted Communications, Ltd.

Brooks v. Halsted Communications, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 476 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 49 U.S.C. § 13102 · 49 U.S.C. § 31132 · 49 U.S.C. § 31502

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Morris v. McComb · Adria International Group Inc Criswell Asssociates Llc v. Ferre Development Inc Angola Investment Inc Mar Chiquita Development Corp · Reich v. Newspapers of New England, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any self-propelled or towed motor vehicle used on a highway in interstate commerce to transport passengers or property when the vehicle— (1) Has a gross vehicle weight rating or gross combination weight rating, or gross vehicle weight or gross combination weight, of 4,536 kg (10,001 pounds) or more, whichever is greater; or (2) Is designed or used to transport more than 8 passengers (including the driver) for compensation; ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In short, according to Defendants, prior to passage of the TCA in 2008, one vehicle over 10,000 pounds, regularly (though not necessarily frequently) used in interstate commerce to transport people or property, could vaccinate an employer from the obligation to pay FLSA overtime to the entire body of its drivers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When SAFETEA-LU reduced the power of the Secretary of Transportation to reach only commercial motor carriers it necessarily also reduced the scope of the Secretary’s power over employees, so that (as explicitly defined in [49 U.S.C.] section 31132(2)) it only reached “an operator of a commercial motor vehicle.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.