Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 P2D 205 - Hendrickson v. Freericks

Hendrickson v. Freericks’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
9
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2019

17 state decisions

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc. · Robinson v. Weitz · Renner v. Crisman · Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. · Bulger v. McCourt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are frequently used in conveyances and have historically been interpreted as meaning”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A restraint on alienation without the consent of the landlord of the tenant’s interest in the leased property is valid, but the landlord’s consent to an alienation by the tenant cannot be withheld unreasonably, unless a freely negotiated provision in the lease gives the landlord an absolute right to withhold consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When used in a deed these words are generally regarded as terms of qualification, not contract. They serve to put a purchaser on notice that he is receiving less than a fee simple. There is nothing in their use which connotes a reservation or retention of property rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.