Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

620 So. 2d 1076

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-06-23

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2001

2 state decisions

Relies on Daniels v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Robert Brown, Jr. appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The un-sworn memoranda attached to the motion, rather than the motion, contain the facts in support of appellant’s allegations. The court correctly refused to entertain the memoranda and denied the motion as facially insufficient. See Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA1984).

¶2Accordingly, we affirm the order without prejudice to appellant’s filing a properly sworn motion.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
/620/so2d/1076 · .json · Public domain