Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 SO2D 115 - Bankston v. State

Bankston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Mincey v. Arizona · Nix v. Williams · Florida v. Jimeno · Murray v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A false explanation given by the accused of any suspicious fact or circumstance tending to connect him [or her] with the offense is admissible in evidence against him [or her]. . . . The jury may properly consider conflicting statements as indicating a consciousness of guilt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard for measuring the scope of a suspect's consent under the Fourth Amendment is that of objective reasonableness — what would the typical reasonable person have understood by the exchange between the officer and the suspect?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.