620 So. 2d 1166 - State v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Ohio · 559 So. 2d 1310 - State v. Lee · 366 So. 2d 1345 - State v. Monroe · 557 So. 2d 1388 - State v. Hallal · State v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prospective jurors' associations with law enforcement agencies or personnel require careful scrutiny by the trial judge. State v. Ford , 489 So.2d 1250 , 1259 (La.1986), vacated on other grounds , 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1272 , 94 L.Ed.2d 133 (1987), on remand , 503 So.2d 1009 (La.1987). If bias or prejudice may be reasonably attributed to the relationship, a juror should be excused for cause. State v. Lewis , 391 So.2d 1156 (La.1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Record
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.