Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 SO2D 1273 - In Re Graham

In Re Graham’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018

17 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 357 So. 2d 172 - In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Etc. · Berger v. United States · In Re Kelly · 341 So. 2d 513 - In Re LaMotte · 379 So. 2d 107 - In Re Crowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “against indiscriminately voicing their objection to the law lest they be misunderstood by the public as being unwilling to enforce the law as written, thereby undermining public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[a] judgeship is a position of trust, not a fiefdom. Litigants and attorneys should not be made to feel that the disparity of power between themselves and the judge jeopardizes their right to justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “As a county judge, Graham made what he perceived to be a valiant effort at ridding Citrus County of the political favoritism and government corruption that caused the demise of his predecessor. His zealous pursuit of a pure society apparently clouded his ability to impartially adjudicate the matters before him. His motives are acceptable, but his methods are not... . We recognize that Graham is not dishonest, venal, or guilty of moral turpitude.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.