¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse the sentence on Count I and remand with directions that the trial court either strike the community control provisions of that sentence, or enter an order setting forth legally justifiable reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); Stanley v. State, 580 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
620 So. 2d 250
Lemont v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 23, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-06-23
Relies on 561 So. 2d 584 - State v. Vanhorn · Stanley v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-06-23
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2012
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →