Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

620 So. 2d 254

Linen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-06-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1995

3 state decisions

Relies on Forbes v. Holiday Corp. Savings & Retirement Plan · 573 So. 2d 284 - Holton v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions for robbery, aggravated battery, and aggravated assault. However, the record on appeal contains no sentencing guidelines scoresheet. For all offenses committed after October 1,1983, preparation and review of a scoresheet is mandatory. See Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2275, 114 L.Ed.2d 726 (1991). Unless it can be established after remand that a guideline score-sheet was prepared, and appellant sentenced consistently therewith, appellant will have to be resentenced.

¶2Convictions affirmed; judgments and sentences reversed for further proceedings.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/620/so2d/254 · .json · Public domain