Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 SO2D 661 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Yamanis v. United States · Good Hope Chemical Corp. Creditors' Committee v. Koerver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Sections 13-A-11-70 and -72 were not enacted as a part of Alabama's new Criminal Code. See 1977 Acts 812, No. 607 (January 1, 1980). Those sections were criminal laws in Alabama prior to the passage of the new Criminal Code, see Ala. Code 1975, § 13-6-150 and -152, and were transferred to the Criminal Code from Title 13, see Table II — Sections Transferred (to Title 13A) 1982 Replacement Vol. 12, Ala. Code 1975 at 3. " Burglary and theft are defined in the Alabama Criminal Code, § 13A-7-7 and § 13A-8-2 , respectively, and each offense embraces acts which would not have constituted its predecessor offense prior to the Criminal Code. See § 13-2-41 (burglary in the second degree), § 13-3-50 (grand larceny), and § 13-3-51 (petit larceny)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The State proved that the appellant had been convicted of burglary in the third degree and theft of property in the first and second degrees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[n]o objection raising this issue was presented to the Circuit Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.