Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 SO2D 679 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Taylor v. State (1994), Hall v. State (1999)

88 state decisions

420199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Neil v. Biggers · Witherspoon v. Illinois · United States v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`Although a juror's reservations about the death penalty may not be sufficient for a challenge for cause, his view may constitute a reasonable explanation for the exercise of a peremptory strike.' Johnson v. State , 620 So.2d 679 , 696 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), reversed on other grounds, 620 So.2d 709 (Ala. 1993), on remand, 620 So.2d 714 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 905 , 114 S.Ct. 285 , 126 L.Ed.2d 235 (1993)."”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We have reviewed the challenged photographs and, although they are not pleasant to look at, we conclude that the trial court did not err in admitting them at either stage of the proceedings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.