Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 SO2D 737 - Curren v. State

Curren v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 574 So. 2d 856 - Sides v. State · 505 So. 2d 1287 - Salazar v. State · 574 So. 2d 859 - Sides v. State · 601 So. 2d 1099 - Harris v. State · Bouleware v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given his consent, subject to the provisions of this division, to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath or urine for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood if lawfully arrested for any offense arising out of acts alleged to have been committed while the person was driving a motor vehicle on the public highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The test or tests shall be administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person to have been driving a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The issue in this case is whether the presumption that a person with `0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol' is `under the influence' applies in a case in which the defendant is charged under § 32-5A-191(a)(1) with driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle with 0.10% or more by weight of alcohol in his blood."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “invaded the province of the jury and amounted to a directed verdict of guilt based upon the results of the blood alcohol test alone.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.