620 So. 2d 739 - Ex Parte State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle while: "(1) There is 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood; "(2) Under the influence of alcohol...."”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. United States v. Abercrombie · Meininger v. State

2. “"The issue in this case is whether the presumption that a person with `0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol' is `under the influence' applies in a case in which the defendant is charged under § 32-5A-191(a)(1) with driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle with 0.10% or more by weight of alcohol in his blood."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte Mayo · 704 So. 2d 1034 - Meininger v. State

3. “`[t]he blood, breath, or urine tests [reflecting a blood alcohol level of .10% or more] were incorrect since the defendant did not exhibit physical signs of intoxication consistent with ... having .10% blood alcohol concentration or higher.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. United States v. Abercrombie · Meininger v. State