Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 620 So. 2d 99 - Hampton v. State

620 So. 2d 99 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2010

9 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Thurston · Wilson v. State · 425 So. 2d 500 - Gwin v. State · 368 So. 2d 554 - Sprinkle v. State · Sprinkle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`In 23 C.J.S., Criminal Law § 993, p. 1024, it is said, "Generally, it is not improper comment on the evidence for the judge to explain his ruling on a matter of law, and he may refer to testimony and state its legal effect, in deciding a point raised during trial."'"”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no evidence ... that defense counsel was admonished without cause or that he was treated more severely than counsel for the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.