Smith v. Young.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Williams v. State of North Carolina · Barber v. Barber · Caldwell v. Taylor · McElreath v. McElreath · 225 Cal. App. 2d 476 - Forslund v. Forslund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The judgment of a sister state may be attacked collaterally for fraud when the defense of fraudulent procurement would be available in the state in which the judgment was rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. Pierce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.