Vincent v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp. (2005), Washkoviak v. Student Loan Marketing Ass'n (2006)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730 · Vicki Bagley Realty, Inc. v. Laufer · Coleman v. Lee Washington Hauling Co. · Nolan v. Nolan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Failure to comply with order. (2) Sanctions by this Court. If a party ... fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under subparagraph (a) of this Rule or Civil Rule 35, or if a party fails to obey an order entered under Civil Rule 26(f) [ (g) ], the Court may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following: (C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;.,..”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. Sera“A motion which requests consideration for the first time of additional circumstances is one which may be designated more properly as filed under Rule 60(b).... However, where it is not clear whether a particular motion should be considered appropriately under Rule 59(e) or 60(b), consistent with the liberal construction policies of these rules, the motion should generally be considered under Rule 59(e), if timely filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it appears that a plaintiff can prove no facts in support of the claim which would entitle the plaintiff to relief. When considering a motion under this rule, the court must construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, assuming for purposes of the motion that the allegations of the complaint are true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.