Evergreen State College v. Cleland’s Empirical Analysis
621 F.2d 1002 · 1980
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Rosen v. Walters (1983), Carter v. Cleland (1980)
12 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 1782 · 38 U.S.C. § 1788
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Johnson v. Robison · Wayne State University v. Cleland · Ca 79-2883 Merged Area in Counties of Benton Cedar Iowa Johnson Jones Linn and Washington State of Iowa v. Cleland a H L
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... 38 U.S.C. § 211 (a) was designed to prevent judicial review of decisions of the VA on individual claims ... it would not bar judicial review of constitutional challenges to provisions of the veterans’ benefits legislation and regulations thereunder, and . . . would not preclude judicial review of challenges to the Administrator’s authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[T]he decisions of the Administrator on any question of law or fact under any law administered by the Veterans’ Administration providing benefits for veterans ... shall be final and conclusive and no other official or any court of the United States shall have power or jurisdiction to review any such decision by an action in the nature of mandamus or otherwise.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . with respect to the nature and extent of proofs and evidence and the method of taking and furnishing them in order to establish the right to benefits under [veterans’ benefits] laws...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirkhuff v. Cleland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.