Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.2d 1073 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.2d 1073 · 1980

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2025

18 federal appellate · 1 district ·

12019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)

Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Mesarosh v. United States · E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train · United States v. Alessio · United States v. Brewster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “makes attempted bribery a crime, and so long as a bribe is 'offered or promised' with the requisite intent 'to influence any official act' the crime is committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is not necessary to show that the official accepted the bribe [to be liable under § 201(b)(1)] . . . . [S]o long as the money is offered with corrupt intent, the official does not necessarily even need to be aware of the bribe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “money was knowingly offered to an official with the intent and expectation that, in exchange for the money, some act of a public official would be influenced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.