Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.2d 1218 - United States v. Wexler

United States v. Wexler’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.2d 1218 · 1980

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2014
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably Angrist v. United States (1980), United States v. Reed (1981)

20 federal appellate ·

1301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Babich v. United States · Rodriguez v. United States · Streeter v. United States · Brown v. Texas · Helfat v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “securities are 'instruments which have intrinsic value and are recognized and used as such in the regular channels of commerce,' " id. at 1223 (citing United States v. Canton, 470 F.2d 861 , 864 (2d Cir.1972)) (emphasis in original), and that "it appears that the decision in each case depends upon the particular facts of that case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “tracks the language of the statute and sufficiently sets forth the elements of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.