Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.2d 20 - McInerney v. Berman

McInerney v. Berman’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.2d 20 · 1980

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2011 · most notably Francis v. Franklin (1985), United States v. Winter (1981)

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 13 state decisions

3501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Cupp v. Naughten · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Tot v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A mandatory presumption which shifts the burden of persuasion by requiring the defendant to establish affirmatively the negative of an element of the offense is unconstitutional.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t will be presumed that [a juror] will not isolate a particular portion of the charge and ascribe to it more importance than the rest”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A judge does not violate constitutional principles of due process by advising the jury that, if they think it reasonable, they may infer the existence of malice from the fact, proved beyond a reasonable doubt, that a defendant shot the victim, stabbed him, or otherwise harmed him with a deadly weapon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.