Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.2d 276 - White v. Bloom

White v. Bloom’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.2d 276 · 1980

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2020
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2020 · most notably Dennis v. Sparks (1980), LRL Properties v. Portage Metro Housing Authority (1995)

43 federal appellate · 6 district ·

60019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Haines v. Kerner · Imbler v. Pachtman · Pierson v. Ray · Preiser v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the [district] court is under a duty to examine the complaint to determine if the allegations provide for relief on any possible theory.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Complaints will be sustained against private persons who conspire with immune public officials if the allegations of conspiracy are sufficiently specific.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The relevant cases demonstrate that the factors determining whether an act by a judge is a “judicial” one relate to the nature of the act itself, i.e., whether it is a function normally performed by a judge, and to the expectations of the parties, i.e., whether they dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.