Arshal v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
621 F.2d 421 · 1980
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2001
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1498 · 35 U.S.C. § 100 · 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on Gottschalk v. Benson · Parker v. Flook · Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. · Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America · In re Prater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a compelling reason must exist before the language can be given weight.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.