Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.2d 464 - David v. Travisono

David v. Travisono’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.2d 464 · 1980

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison · King v. Greenblatt · Stanford Daily v. Zurcher · Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, II

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It follows that one who succeeds in obtaining an injunction under that Title should ordinarily recover an attorney's fee unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “intended to apply to all cases pending on the date of enactment as well as all future cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.