United States v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
621 F.3d 1131 · 2010
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1813 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 20 · 18 U.S.C. § 225 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 657 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Bestfoods · Miles v. Apex Marine Corp. · Musser v. States · Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As early as 1926, the Supreme Court recognized that '[t]he owner of the shares of stock in a company is not the owner of the corporation's property.' While the shareholder has a right to share in corporate dividends, he does not own the corporate property.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n individual shareholder, by virtue of his ownership of shares, does not own the corporation's assets[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.