Holland v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
621 F.3d 1366 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295
Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · United States v. Winstar Corp. · Winstar Corporation Fsb v. United States · Anderson v. United States · California Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Illinois law, the absolute and unconditional release of one co-obligor releases all other co-obligors even if the other co-obligors 'were not a party to the release or specifically identified in the release.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The intent at issue is whether the parties intended the agreement to serve as an 'absolute and unconditional' release of the co-obligor executing the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“proper subject matter, competent parties, meeting of the minds of the parties, and consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.