United States v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
621 F.3d 312 · 2010
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. (2011), United States v. Berrios (2012)
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1346 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Olano · Puckett v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Griffith v. Kentucky · United States v. Cotton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether [the witness’s] remarles were pronounced and persistent, creating a likelihood they would mislead and prejudice the jury; (2) the strength of the other evidence; and (3) curative action taken by the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“all reasonable inferences in favor of the jury verdict.” Riley, 621 F.3d at 329 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We will overturn the verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only when the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighted, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.