Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.3d 658 - Flying J, Inc. v. Van Hollen

Flying J, Inc. v. Van Hollen’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.3d 658 · 2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Parker v. Brown · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland Shell Oil Company · Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is only when a state law mandates or authorizes collusive conduct that it is preempted by federal antitrust law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.