Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F.3d 914 - United States v. Millis

United States v. Millis’s Empirical Analysis

621 F.3d 914 · 2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 668D · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Taylor v. United States · United States v. Bass · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Schneider v. State · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires courts to limit the reach of criminal statutes to the clear import of their text and construe any ambiguity against the government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.