¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3Joseph Ruhren 'appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. *220§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruhren v. Spittal, No. 1:15-cv-00445-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. May 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4 AFFIRMED.