621 F. App'x 35 - Michaels v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he [c]ourt therefore reverses the ALJ's decision at the fifth step and instructs the ALJ on remand to obtain additional vocational expert testimony to address whether the jobs [identified], or any other jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy, can be performed within the limitations of [plaintiff's] RFC, including the limitation of 'no reading and writing' "). Gonzalez-Cruz originally applied for benefits more than seven years ago. Having concluded that a remand for further fact-finding at step five is necessary, I direct that "further proceedings before the ALJ be completed within 120 days of the issuance of [this order] and, that if the decision is a denial of benefits, a final decision of the Commissioner be rendered within 60 days of [Gonzalez-Cruz's] appeal from the ALJ's decision.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 F. Supp. 3d 164 - Gonzalez-Cruz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

2. “deadlines are not observed, a calculation of benefits owed [Gonzalez-Cruz] must be made immediately.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 F. Supp. 3d 164 - Gonzalez-Cruz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.