621 F. Supp. 622 - Haskins v. Stanton’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2011
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2012 · 7 U.S.C. § 2013 · 7 U.S.C. § 2016 · 7 U.S.C. § 2020 · 7 U.S.C. § 2025
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Fortin v. Commissioner of Massachusetts Department of Public Welfare · Smith v. Miller · On/tv of Chicago v. Julien · Muhich v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is extremely serious and is quite likely to impose lingering, if not irreversible, hardships upon recipients.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haskins v. Stanton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.