621 F. Supp. 725 - Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Dart Group Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2012
2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 15 U.S.C. § 80A
Relies on Helfat v. Securities & Exchange Commission · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · 113 F. Supp. 265 - T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp. · In Re John Doe Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A lawyer who has represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter: (1) represent another client in the same or a substantially related matter in which that client’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.