Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 F. Supp. 2d 1074 - Saenz v. Trans Union, LLC

621 F. Supp. 2d 1074 - Saenz v. Trans Union, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681E · 15 U.S.C. § 1681I · 15 U.S.C. § 1681N · 15 U.S.C. § 1681O · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Thomas v. Arn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reasonableness of the procedures and whether the agency followed them will be jury questions in the overwhelming majority of cases”). This is not one of those cases, however. Grigoryan adduces no evidence, and fails even to argue, that defendants’ procedures for maintaining and operating their internal databases were not reasonable. Thus, there is no question to send to the jury, the claims fail, and judgment as a matter of law is properly entered in defendants’ favor. See Darrin, 2014 WL 1922819 at (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a [CRA] accurately transcribes, stores and communicates consumer information received from a source that it reasonably believes to be reputable, and which is credible on its face, the agency does not violate [ § 1681e ] simply by reporting an item of information that turns out to be inaccurate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “simply does not permit any inference [about] the reasonableness of [the defendant CRA's] procedures”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.