621 F. Supp. 2d 165 - In Re Intel Corp. Derivative Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) [T]he directors utterly failed to implement any reporting or information system or controls; or (b) having implemented such a system or controls, consciously failed to monitor or oversee its operations thus disabling themselves from being informed of risks or problems requiring their attention. In either, case, imposition of liability requires a showing that the directors knew that they were not discharging their fiduciary obligations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 93 F. Supp. 3d 1092 - Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Davis

2. “whether or not the particularized factual allegations of a derivative stockholder complaint create a reasonable doubt that, as of the time the complaint is filed, the board of directors could have properly exercised its independent and disinterested business judgment in responding to a demand.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litigation