Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · Mayers v. United States · Cherek v. United States · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the experts were testifying as to their examination of appellant and their impressions of his truthfulness as it affected their examination. None of the witnesses undertook to testify concerning the truthfulness of appellant's testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. State“invoked the defense of insanity and a psychiatric examination disclosed that he was brain damaged at birth, was both retarded and mentally ill, and had a history of bizarre behavior including the torturing and killing of animals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. State“Every man is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his acts, and where one does an illegal act he is responsible for all the consequences that legitimately flow therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.