Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

621 N.W.2d 459

Clausen v. DOTSON CO.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 2001

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 2001-01-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Roger D. CLAUSEN, Relator,
v.
The DOTSON COMPANY, and American Mutual Liability Ins. Co./Minn. Insurance Guaranty Association/MIGA, Respondents,
Continental Machines, Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company, Respondents,
D.C. Hey Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and
Special Compensation Fund.

No. C0-00-1864.

¶1Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 17, 2001.
Rehearing Denied February 14, 2001.

¶2Roger D. Calusen, Mankato, MN, Pro Se.

¶3Cousineau, McGuire & Anderson, John T. Thul, Minneapolis, for Respondents Continental Machines' and Reliance Ins. Co.'s.

¶4Abrams & Smith, Paul R. Smith, Minneapolis, for Respondents Dotson Company's and MIGA.

¶5Conley & Borgeson, Steven C. Gilmore, St. Paul, for Respondents D.C. Hey Co.'s and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.'s.

¶6Special Compensation Fund, Workers' Compensation Division, St. Paul, for Respondent Special Compensation Fund's.

¶7Considered and decided by the court en banc.

¶8

ORDER

¶9PER CURIAM.

¶10Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

¶11*460 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 26, 2000, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

/621/nw2d/459 · .json · Public domain