Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 NW2D 472 - Brua v. Olson

Brua v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Groe · Calder v. City of Crystal · City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. · Lee v. Arrowood · In Re Estate of Bush

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the legislature could have but did not make the statute of limitations applicable to “any action brought under this act,” we read the two-year limitation [in Minn.Stat. § 340A.802, subd. 2] as only applying to direct actions against the liquor vendor brought under section 340A.801.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.