Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 NW2D 801 - Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. Larson

Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc. · Obraske v. Woody · Sentry Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Mariner's Cay Development Corp. · Harris v. Dyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] demand or assertion by one of the parties, seeking as a matter of right, adjustment or interpretation of Contract terms, payment of money, extension of time or other relief with respect to the Contract. The term “Claim” also in- eludes other disputes and matters in question between the Owner and Contractor arising out of or relating to the Contract. Claims must be made by written notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether or not a party has agreed to arbitrate a particular dispute is a matter of contract interpretation, which this court reviews de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.