Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 P.2d 1350 - Tuckfield v. State

Tuckfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Juneby v. State (1982), State v. Andrews (1985)

34 state decisions

19019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25 · 18 Cal. 3d 687 - Davis v. Dennis B. · Whitton v. State · Waters v. State · State v. Wortham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that [the] double jeopardy [clause] is violated by conviction of both an offense and a lesser included offense, unless the convictions arise from separate conduct. E.g., In re Dennis B. [ 18 Cal.3d 687 ], ... 135 Cal.Rptr. 82 , 557 P.2d 514 (Cal.1976); People v. Brown [ 185 Colo. 272 ], ... 523 P.2d 986, 988 (1974). [This] rule is related to, but distinguishable from, the question considered in Whitton v. State [ 479 P.2d 302 (Alaska 1970) ] ... concerning when separate punishment[s] may be imposed for separate statutory offenses arising out of the same conduct.... A lesser included offense may differ in terms of conduct or intent from the greater offense [for Whitton purposes]. However, a conviction of both will still be proscribed by the double jeopardy bar.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.