Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 P2D 263 - Matter of Stump

Matter of Stump’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2018

11 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 14 Cal. 3d 524 - In Re Kreamer · Ex Parte Thompson · Matter of Goldman · In Re Preston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would undoubtedly cause this court to reject his application out of hand, on the ground that he lacks that essential quality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “`[u]nless we keep clean our own house ... we cannot expect the public to have confidence in ... our system of justice.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Alaska Bar Rule 2(1)(d). If Buckalew were applying for admission to the bar at this time, his misconduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.