Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 P2D 5 - Uptegraft v. State

Uptegraft v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2001

8 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Delaware v. Prouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is possible to speculate that there was [only] a small likelihood that one of the suspects would have been able to leap into the car to obtain a weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.