Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 So. 2d 120 - Mayo v. Crazovich

621 So. 2d 120 - Mayo v. Crazovich’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Osborne v. Osborne · 575 So. 2d 942 - Crockett v. Crockett · Norred v. Norred · 591 So. 2d 396 - Norred v. Norred · Culpepper v. Culpepper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(6) "Income" means: (c) The court may also consider as income the benefits a party derives from expense-sharing or other sources; however, in determining the benefits of expense-sharing, the court shall not consider the income of another spouse, regardless of the legal regime under which the remarriage exists, except to the extent that such income is used directly to reduce the cost of a party's actual expenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a party is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, child support shall be calculated based on a determination of his or her income earning potential...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(4) "Gross income" means: (c) Gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses required to produce income, for purposes of income from self-employment, rent, royalties, proprietorship of a business, or joint ownership or a partnership or closely held corporation. "Ordinary and necessary expenses" shall not include amounts allowable by the Internal Revenue Service for the accelerated component of depreciation expenses or investment tax credits or any other business expenses determined by the court to be inappropriate for determining gross income for purposes of calculating child support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.