Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 SO2D 1255 - Ex Parte Spears

Ex Parte Spears’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc. (1993), Ex Parte Ziglar (1995)

46 state decisions

240199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Abney v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Grady v. Corbin · Ball v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a criminal defendant is to avoid exposure to double jeopardy and thereby enjoy the full protection of the [double jeopardy] clause, his double jeopardy challenge to the indictment must be reviewable before the subsequent exposure occurs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ, to be issued only where there is a clear legal right to the relief sought by the *Page 385 petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.