State v. Neisler’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny further motions to reduce, increase or amend the bond must be brought before the Magistrate Commissioner until such time that the defendant is formally charged and his case is allotted to one of the ten felony sections of the Criminal District Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“bonds reduced, increased or amended by judges who do not have trial jurisdiction, do so without authority to act, C.Cr.P. art. 321 [current Art. 342], and thus commit error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In addition to the sections of the Criminal District Court for the parish of Orleans now existing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.