Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 So. 2d 335 - Daniels v. State

621 So. 2d 335 - Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2018

14 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Faretta v. California · Simmons v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' 549 So.2d at 150 . The trial court makes a preliminary determination `without the aid of a jury as to whether reasonable grounds existed to doubt the defendant's competency.' Rule 11.3, A.R.Crim.P., Committee Comments.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n determining whether an out-of-state conviction will be used to enhance punishment pursuant to the HFOA, the conduct upon which the foreign conviction is based must be considered and not the foreign jurisdiction's treatment of that conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In all cases when it is shown that a criminal defendant has been previously convicted of any three felonies and after such convictions has committed ... a Class A felony, he must be punished by imprisonment for life without parole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.