Kent v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2000
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 587 So. 2d 1072 - Parker v. State · United States v. Harrington · 384 So. 2d 1224 - Williamson v. State · Howell v. State · Ex Parte Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was made by defense counsel out of the hearing of the jury. Therefore, the prosecution did not draw particular attention to the source or implications of the photographs. For these reasons, the trial court did not err in admitting the photographic lineup into evidence. Accordingly, the appellant's argument is without merit. V. The appellant's fifth argument is that the trial court improperly allowed the prosecution to ask leading questions *Page 196 during the direct examination of three of its witnesses. (Issue VII in the appellant's brief to this court.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.