Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 621 So. 2d 481 - Schiller v. Miller

621 So. 2d 481 - Schiller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 384 So. 2d 734 - Contemporary Interiors v. Four Marks, Inc. · Playpen South, Inc. v. City of Oakland Park · 156 So. 2d 421 - First National Bank in St. Petersburg v. Ferris · 320 So. 2d 415 - Gill v. Shively · Price, Et Vir v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that injunctions may not be granted for the retention of personal property unless it is found to be unique or otherwise peculiar, and unless the plaintiff demonstrates that there is no adequate remedy at law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.